I just finished assembling my HF 40”x48” trailer (with 12” wheels) per their instructions and wanted to see how closely their design had achieved a 10% tongue weight. So, I set the trailer on three bathroom scales.
Lt. wheel: 62#
Rt. wheel: 64#
Tongue: 12#
At 8.7%, that tongue weight comes in a little light, right? (But to the upside, the trailer is 47 pounds lighter than the advertised shipping weight of 185 pounds, which allows me an extra 5 gallons of fresh water. Yeah!)
An aside:
“Why”, you might ask, “would anyone own three sets of bathroom scales?”
Last week I didn’t. But my intention is a light-weight, custom design (built over the wheels and partly on to the tongue for a 52”x92” chassis), so I needed a means to track weights as I build. Goodwill was selling used scales for $4/each. So, I added a pair to the one I already owned and then adjusted all three so they would read the same when equally loaded at mid-range.
My current tongue weight is a meaningless number because of the mod I propose, which is to extend the bed 24” (and the tongue, too, of course). That would normally invalidate the bolt pattern for present axle position, but my guess is that by rotating the frame 180 degrees and by making my additions at what has now become the forward edge, I can leave the axle where it is. (The spring assembly will need rotating as well --which is no biggie-- as isn’t changing the axle position if I have to, because I’m assembling with bolts rather than welding. So far, at least).
In other words, instead of having the axle at its designed 38% of the load platform and 23% of overall length (as measured from the rear of the trailer), my modifications to the frame will put the axle at 41% and 31%, respectfully. (In other words, my estimated center of gravity will be 10" forward of my axle, which is at least the right direction if not the right position.) But those numbers and estimates are probably just meaningless numbers until I start driving screws nails and gluing up panels).
What seems to matter –-if I correctly understand the many helpful posts on such matters-- is having the chassis as close to the tow vehicle as possible (for aero-dynamics) and the axle as far away as possible (for backing ease and to dampen towing sway) while still loading the hitch properly (which can be partly achieved by changing how the interior of the chassis is built and loaded).
Hence, my need for scales and for weighing as I build (and, also, a fairly flexible design that I can alter as needed).
Charlie
PS What will my design look like? I'm still sketching, but think of a boat on wheels --i.e., curves in both plan view and elevation, and you'll see where I'm headed. The features I want to include are: a porta-potty tucked away in an air-tight closet when not in use; a fold-away shower; an interior galley with double sinks and burners that runs forward to aft on the stbd side (rather than port to stbd across the rear of the chassis); a foldaway dining/projects table (e.g., map reading or fly tying); a single bunk of the back-packer style (i.e., to be rolled up and stored each day when the floor space is needed). Standing room will be achieved with a popup roof. That's a lot of features, but on paper at least, they all seem possible.
As for the shape, by using curved sides --rather than the flat sides of a tradional TD-- I can pick up rigidity and keep my weight down, as well as build on a narrower frame than the standard 4'x8', which eases the load on my tow vehicle, a '90 Tercel.