BLM bad, bad, bad

Converting Cargo Trailers into TTTs

BLM bad, bad, bad

Postby hankaye » Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:25 am

Howdy All;

Just ran across the following in a weekly news letter I get;

https://www.rvtravel.com/congress-fails ... rvt-1128b/

and

https://www.rvtravel.com/roaders-appeal ... rvt-1129b/

Just thought ya'll might like to know.

hank
Striving for a less complicated life since 1949 ...
Every day I beat my own previous record for number of consecutive days I've stayed alive.
hankaye
2000 Club
2000 Club
 
Posts: 2567
Images: 1
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 5:35 pm
Location: S.W. New Mexico

Re: BLM bad, bad, bad

Postby rjgimp » Sun Nov 05, 2023 9:12 pm

:x :x :x

Filthy rotten scoundrels.
"If it pleases the crown, may I be permitted to rest briefly aside the King's highway...?"

:x :x :x

I follow a youtube channel called Gonagain. He posted this with similar concerns recently.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cs7X92G1zyQ
-Rob


I hope to make it to a Procrastinators Anonymous meeting someday...
just as soon as the steering committee gets around to scheduling one!
User avatar
rjgimp
500 Club
 
Posts: 785
Images: 7
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2019 3:59 am
Location: Saint Paul MN

Re: BLM bad, bad, bad

Postby tony.latham » Sun Nov 05, 2023 10:49 pm

Filthy rotten scoundrels.


I read the proposed rule. There's nothing in it that addresses camping. The rule puts conservation on the same footing as grazing, mining, oil extraction etc.

Somebody is gaslighting this thing. Big oi? Mining companies? :thumbdown:

Tony
User avatar
tony.latham
Gold Donating Member
 
Posts: 6900
Images: 17
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:03 pm
Location: Middle of Idaho on the edge of nowhere
Top

Re: BLM bad, bad, bad

Postby GTS225 » Mon Nov 06, 2023 8:09 am

I suspect Mr. Hankaye is the one doing the gaslighting. After all.....new user with exactly one post. Spam, or a troll?

Just me having suspicions.....Roger
GTS225
The 300 Club
 
Posts: 300
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 2:11 am
Location: Waterloo, Iowa
Top

Re: BLM bad, bad, bad

Postby tony.latham » Mon Nov 06, 2023 9:49 am

After all.....new user with exactly one post.


Hank's been here a while. +2500 posts.

Tony
User avatar
tony.latham
Gold Donating Member
 
Posts: 6900
Images: 17
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:03 pm
Location: Middle of Idaho on the edge of nowhere
Top

Re: BLM bad, bad, bad

Postby RJ Howell » Mon Nov 06, 2023 10:48 am

I took the time and went through several articles, both pro & con on this. My take is this action is to remove BLM's power to do as it pleases and create over-sight. I'm I missing something here?

No article specially states reduction in any uses, yet all show how BLM has the ability (under the current rule) to remove any portion of use for another, without over-sight.

Just my take on what I have read.
RJ Howell
1000 Club
1000 Club
 
Posts: 1163
Images: 36
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 6:08 am
Top

Re: BLM bad, bad, bad

Postby tony.latham » Mon Nov 06, 2023 4:26 pm

My take is this action is to remove BLM's power...


Here's the rule:

https://www.blm.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2023-03/Public%20Lands%20Proposed%20Rule%20-%20Conservation%20and%20Landscape%20Health%20-Final%20Clean%20Version%203-29-23.pdf

"The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) proposes new regulations that,
pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), as
amended, and other relevant authorities, would advance the BLM’s mission to manage
the public lands for multiple use and sustained yield by prioritizing the health and
resilience of ecosystems across those lands."

It's about multiple use. The way I read it, it puts recreation at the same level as grazing and mining. And that's a good thing, in my mind.

Tony
User avatar
tony.latham
Gold Donating Member
 
Posts: 6900
Images: 17
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:03 pm
Location: Middle of Idaho on the edge of nowhere
Top


Return to Cargo Trailer Conversions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests