Page 1 of 1

BLM bad, bad, bad

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:25 am
by hankaye
Howdy All;

Just ran across the following in a weekly news letter I get;

https://www.rvtravel.com/congress-fails ... rvt-1128b/

and

https://www.rvtravel.com/roaders-appeal ... rvt-1129b/

Just thought ya'll might like to know.

hank

Re: BLM bad, bad, bad

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2023 9:12 pm
by rjgimp
:x :x :x

Filthy rotten scoundrels.
"If it pleases the crown, may I be permitted to rest briefly aside the King's highway...?"

:x :x :x

I follow a youtube channel called Gonagain. He posted this with similar concerns recently.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cs7X92G1zyQ

Re: BLM bad, bad, bad

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2023 10:49 pm
by tony.latham
Filthy rotten scoundrels.


I read the proposed rule. There's nothing in it that addresses camping. The rule puts conservation on the same footing as grazing, mining, oil extraction etc.

Somebody is gaslighting this thing. Big oi? Mining companies? :thumbdown:

Tony

Re: BLM bad, bad, bad

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2023 8:09 am
by GTS225
I suspect Mr. Hankaye is the one doing the gaslighting. After all.....new user with exactly one post. Spam, or a troll?

Just me having suspicions.....Roger

Re: BLM bad, bad, bad

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2023 9:49 am
by tony.latham
After all.....new user with exactly one post.


Hank's been here a while. +2500 posts.

Tony

Re: BLM bad, bad, bad

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2023 10:48 am
by RJ Howell
I took the time and went through several articles, both pro & con on this. My take is this action is to remove BLM's power to do as it pleases and create over-sight. I'm I missing something here?

No article specially states reduction in any uses, yet all show how BLM has the ability (under the current rule) to remove any portion of use for another, without over-sight.

Just my take on what I have read.

Re: BLM bad, bad, bad

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2023 4:26 pm
by tony.latham
My take is this action is to remove BLM's power...


Here's the rule:

https://www.blm.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2023-03/Public%20Lands%20Proposed%20Rule%20-%20Conservation%20and%20Landscape%20Health%20-Final%20Clean%20Version%203-29-23.pdf

"The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) proposes new regulations that,
pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), as
amended, and other relevant authorities, would advance the BLM’s mission to manage
the public lands for multiple use and sustained yield by prioritizing the health and
resilience of ecosystems across those lands."

It's about multiple use. The way I read it, it puts recreation at the same level as grazing and mining. And that's a good thing, in my mind.

Tony